A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2018; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
Winning Awards or Winning Citations: A Retrospective Look at the Consistency between Evaluative Metrics
2018
Communications of the Association for Information Systems
Appropriate evaluation of information systems research papers ensures that our institutions and review processes stay viable. In the short run, we typically assess research value through research awards, while, in the longer term, we typically assess research value based on how the research community sees and draws from particular published research papers. In this study, we examine the consistency between two metrics for assessing research value: research awards and citations. To do so, we
doi:10.17705/1cais.04220
fatcat:xupwylsfwzcl5aknd4nms7ccma