A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2019; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
that individual prejudgment notice to members of a federal Rule 23(b)(3) class was required under subsection (c)(2) of the Rule, not that it was constitutionally required. Id. at 173-75. The Court has never held that notice to members of Rule 23(b)(1) or (b)(2) classes is required, even by the Rule itself. 13 See infra text accompanying notes 24-36.doi:10.2307/3311894 fatcat:53wbwebnwja3lczelp2ypfv5aq