The innovation paradox: a selective review of the literature on action learning and innovation

Mike Pedler, Cheryl Brook
2017 Action Learning: Research and Practice  
This is a literature review which aims to explore selective literatures in action learning and innovation in order to illuminate insights into the gap between innovation, engagement and implementation in practice. We conducted a search for articles in the action learning field with titles, keywords or abstracts which mentioned innovation, beginning with work by Revans which highlighted our central concern : the innovation paradox. Our investigation took in books, but was principally focused on
more » ... cipally focused on journal articles. We then explored the innovation literature, with a particular emphasis in our search on titles, key words and abstracts which mentioned 'service innovation' and 'organisational learning'. In essence, our review suggests that paradox theory may be a useful way of thinking about the problem of the resistances to, and the failures of, innovation, and that action learning may offer up a useful space in which the innovation paradox might be worked upon. The study is limited to a review of the extant literature and offers no empirical evidence to support its conclusions. Further research could focus on such questions as why innovation remains so elusive, and how might the practice of critical action learning help to enhance innovative capacity and capability.
doi:10.1080/14767333.2017.1326877 fatcat:wzgrfyxzb5dsdhonxrxtxkvipm