Advisory processes and their descriptive data

Milan Mišovič
2005 Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis  
MIŠOVIČ, M.: Advisory processes and their descriptive data. Acta univ. agric. et silvic. Mendel. Brun., 2005, LIII, No. 6, pp. 109-118 Processes are regarded as a representative of all firm activities what is valid for Web-based Advisory Systems, too. Interpretation of processes from the both sides managers and informaticians is naturally different what is given by their scientific platforms and observed objectives. Managers have connected all firm processes with the firm prosperity and firm
more » ... petition ability. Therefore they have followed understanding, modeling and regular improving of all processes what should stimulate and evoke using of process revisions (reengineering). The main role in such process understanding is thus committed to the firm management. The most professional computer process implementations are dominant objectives of Informaticians. In this conception all processes have been understood as real sequences of partial transactions (elementary firm activities) and data processed by them regardless of using of a structural or object process approach modeling. The process and transaction models, submitted by informaticians, are connected with process content orientation. This content has to be programmed. The firm management represents the main resource of the process knowledge used by informaticians. In addition to these two process conceptions there is a different approach based on a process description by a descriptive data. The descriptive data are not oriented to a process content but to its theoretical conception and real implementation. The descriptive data processing inside special algebra operations can bring a lot of very important and easily economically interpreted results. advisory firm, advisory case, standard advisory case, real advisory case, process and advisory case descriptive data, algebra for descriptive data processing. Ročník LIII 11 Číslo 6, 2005
doi:10.11118/actaun200553060109 fatcat:7oc53z3f7fd53iopjn6xqgwrlu