A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2018; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
The Authors Reply
2015
American Journal of Epidemiology
the younger age group might have resulted in selection bias. Because the number of excluded cancer patients roughly matched the number included in the analyses (approximately 22,000 vs. 25,000 patients), the probable bias could be significant. Furthermore, we reviewed some studies (2, 3) with results contrary to those of the study by Stevens et al. and found that in those studies, there were wider age ranges for participants respectively,. Therefore, the differences between the results of these
doi:10.1093/aje/kwv247
pmid:26454258
fatcat:i3c725hjp5hxlk4nntr4mnd3wm