Alkohol, andre rusmidler og vold i epidemiologisk perspektiv
Kai Pernanen
2009
Norsk Epidemiologi
<strong><span style="font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT;"><span style="font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT;"><p align="left"> </p></span></span><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT;"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT;">SAMMENDRAG</span></span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;"><p align="left">Den medisinske interessen for
more »
... ld og voldsskader har økt kraftig i løpet av de siste to tiårene. Det epidemiologiske</p><p align="left">perspektivet på vold har blitt forsterket og et mer etiologisk og preventivt syn på volden er mere merkbar</p><p align="left">innenfor sosialmedisinsk forskning. Alkoholen er en etiologisk faktor som har vist seg å være forbundet med vold</p><p align="left">i de aller fleste samfunn. I denne artikkelen beskrives de viktigste epidemiologiske metodene og funnene i studiet</p><p align="left">av alkoholens sammenheng med vold. Denne sammenhengen har vist seg ikke å være direkte, men er avhengig av</p><p align="left">en rekke andre faktorer, og noen forskjellige typer av kausal avhengighet beskrives i artikkelen. Den epidemiologiske</p><p align="left">forskningen om andre rusmidlers sammenheng med vold er betydelig mindre omfattende enn den er for</p><p align="left">alkohol. Det er også åpenbart at andre rusmidler ikke er like sterkt sammenknyttet med vold som alkoholen.</p><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;"><p align="left">Pernanen K.</p></span></span></span><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;"><p align="left"> </p></span></span><p align="left"><strong><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT;"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT;">Alcohol, other drugs, and violence in an epidemiological perspective.</span></span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;"><p align="left">Nor J Epidemiol</p></span></span></span><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;"><p align="left"> </p></span></span><strong><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT;"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT;">ENGLISH SUMMARY</span></span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;"><p align="left">The public health approach to violence has become increasingly accepted during the last couple of decades. This</p><p align="left">has led to more epidemiological research into violence, and a stronger medical interest in the etiology and prevention</p><p align="left">of violence. However, epidemiological research on the prevalence of violence in different societies is still</p><p align="left">mainly criminological in nature, being based on information about violence that has come to the attention of the</p><p align="left">police or processed in the courts. The study of the relationship between alcohol use and violent behaviour is also</p><p align="left">predominantly based on police and court materials, although an increasing number of emergency room and</p><p align="left">hospitalization studies have examined the role of alcohol in injuries caused by violence.</p><p align="left">There are two basic methodological approaches in the study of the relationship between alcohol use and</p><p align="left">violence. The alcohol-involvement studies estimate the extent to which drinking by the offender or the victim was</p><p align="left">present in episodes of violence. Time trend studies and so-called natural experiments measure how rates of violent</p><p align="left">crime covary with levels of alcohol consumption in a population. Generally, these studies indicate that alcohol use</p><p align="left">is a potent factor in determining the prevalence of violent behaviour in a society. However, there is no evidence</p><p align="left">showing that a significant part of alcohol-related violence is directly caused by the presence of alcohol in the</p><p align="left">organism. Four types of conditional factors affecting the risk of violent behaviour after drinking are discussed: (1)</p><p align="left">the nature of the alcohol factor, (2) characteristics of the individual drinker, (3) the socio-cultural context in which</p><p align="left">drinking occurs, and (4) situational factors.</p><p align="left">The epidemiological evidence for a relationship between violence and the use of other drugs is much more</p><p align="left">scattered. It is complicated by the fact that most drug users use more than one type of drug. When an illegal</p><p align="left">psychoactive drug is implicated in violent behaviour, it is often also accompanied by alcohol use. Clinical and</p><p align="left">experimental evidence shows that the risk of aggression and physical violence depends, in addition to the type of</p><p align="left">drug, on the amounts used, the method of application, the phase of acute intoxication, and the long-term pattern of</p><p align="left">use. However, the violence associated with the use of illegal drugs is perhaps most closely determined by the</p><p align="left">characteristics of an illegal economy. Rival criminal organizations manufacture, distribute and sell these drugs,</p><p align="left">and they use violence and threats as a means of regulating this economy. In addition, many drug users resort to</p><p>violent crime in an effort to secure the funds needed for their addiction.</p></span></span><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;">1996; </span></span><strong><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT;"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT;">6 </span></span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: TimesNewRomanPSMT;">(1): 29-36.</span></span></p>
doi:10.5324/nje.v6i1.272
fatcat:lhv2jmbjtbdahnid7p7ptgo3ne