Evolutionarily plastic regions at human 3p21.3 coincide with tumor breakpoints identified by the "elimination test"

E. Darai, M. Kost-Alimova, H. Kiss, H. Kansoul, G. Klein, S. Imreh
2005 Genomics  
We have previously found with the microcell hybrid-based "elimination test" that human chromosome 3 transferred into murine or human tumor cells regularly lost certain 3p regions during tumor growth in SCID mice. The most common eliminated region, CER1, is¨2.4 Mb at 3p21.3. CER1 breakpoints were clustered in approximately 200-kb regions at both telomeric and centromeric borders. We have also shown, earlier, that tumor-related deletions often coincide with human/mouse synteny breakpoints on 3p12
more » ... -p22. Here we describe the results of a comparative genomic analysis on the CER1 region in Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, Fugu rubripes, Gallus gallus, Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, and Canis familiaris. First, four independent synteny breaks were found within the CER1 telomeric breakpoint cluster region, comparing human, dog, and chicken genomes, and two independent synteny breaks within the CER1 centromeric breakpoint cluster region, comparing human, mouse, and chicken genomes, suggesting a nonrandom involvement of tumor breakpoint regions in chromosome evolution. Second, both CER1 breakpoint cluster regions show recent tandem duplications (seven Zn finger protein family genes at the telomeric and eight chemokine receptor genes at the centromeric side). Finally, all genes from these regions underwent horizontal evolution in mammals, with formation of new genes and expansion of gene families, which were displayed in the human genome as tandem gene duplications and pseudogene insertions. In contrast the CER1 middle region contained evolutionarily well-conserved solitary genes and a minimal amount of retroposed genes. The coincidence of evolutionary plasticity with CER1 breakpoints may suggest that regional structural instability is expressed in both evolutionary and cancer-associated chromosome rearrangements. D
doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.04.003 pmid:15913951 fatcat:vvyxllv2vzghfpibgxqjhvic5y