Internet Archive Scholar

Review of "The response of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling under different aerosol-based radiation management geoengineering" [post]

Anonymous
2020 unpublished

Preserved Fulltext

Web Archive Capture PDF (74.2 kB)
https://web.archive.org/web/20200831192813/https://esd.copernicus.org/preprints/esd-2020-57/esd-2020-57-RC2.pdf

A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2020; you can also visit the original URL. The file type is application/pdf.

This manuscript studied how vegetation carbon and soil carbon changes under three solar radiation management: sulfate aerosol injection, marine cloud brightening and cirrus cloud thinning. The three SRM strategies result different responses of terrestrial carbon pools. Based on analysis of temperature and precipitation changes, they concluded that precipitation is the factor to determine the terrestrial carbon storage under SRM scenarios comparing with RCP8.5. They also concluded that CO2
more » ... tration and land surface usage play a more important role than climate changes under SRM. There are only a few works on SRM impacts on vegetation and terrestrial carbon cycle, and more research are needed to further understand vegetation and carbon cycle responses to climate changes from SRM. Therefore, this study is filling the gap C1 ESDD Interactive comment Printer-friendly version Discussion paper
doi:10.5194/esd-2020-57-rc2 fatcat:oqrgfx2mnfafjfo3on273s3fae
Citation

Anonymous. "Review of "The response of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling under different aerosol-based radiation management geoengineering"." (2020)