Coin-flipping, ball-dropping, and grass-hopping for generating random graphs from matrices of edge probabilities [article]

Arjun S. Ramani and Nicole Eikmeier and David F. Gleich
2017 arXiv   pre-print
Common models for random graphs, such as Erdős-Rényi and Kronecker graphs, correspond to generating random adjacency matrices where each entry is non-zero based on a large matrix of probabilities. Generating an instance of a random graph based on these models is easy, although inefficient, by flipping biased coins (i.e. sampling binomial random variables) for each possible edge. This process is inefficient because most large graph models correspond to sparse graphs where the vast majority of
more » ... n flips will result in no edges. We describe some not-entirely-well-known, but not-entirely-unknown, techniques that will enable us to sample a graph by finding only the coin flips that will produce edges. Our analogies for these procedures are ball-dropping, which is easier to implement, but may need extra work due to duplicate edges, and grass-hopping, which results in no duplicated work or extra edges. Grass-hopping does this using geometric random variables. In order to use this idea on complex probability matrices such as those in Kronecker graphs, we decompose the problem into three steps, each of which are independently useful computational primitives: (i) enumerating non-decreasing sequences, (ii) unranking multiset permutations, and (iii) decoding and encoding z-curve and Morton codes and permutations. The third step is the result of a new connection between repeated Kronecker product operations and Morton codes. Throughout, we draw connections to ideas underlying applied math and computer science including coupon collector problems.
arXiv:1709.03438v1 fatcat:rqweozesfnaejjyhnbidjvdkre