Validation Of Self-Reported Anthropometrics In Female College Freshmen

Ryan J. Leone, Mary-Jon Ludy, Amy Morgan
2014 Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise  
International Journal of Exercise Science 9(1): 47-55, 2016. Most investigations concerning the validity of self-reported anthropometrics focus on weight, height, and body mass index. This study extends those investigations by exploring the impact of self-reporting bias on the disease risk indicators of waist circumference and body fat percentage. Female college freshmen (n=128) self-reported weight and height, then underwent measurements for weight, height, waist circumference, and body fat
more » ... ce, and body fat percentage. Self-reporting bias was defined as selfreported minus directly-assessed anthropometric value. Despite no differences in self-reported versus directly-assessed weight or height for the total group, students with high waist circumference and excess fat under-reported their weight by 2.3±4.4 lb (p<0.05). Self-reporting bias was negatively correlated with waist circumference (r=-0.362; p<0.001) and body fat percentage (r=-0.317; p<0.001). Although many female college freshmen accurately represent their weight, those with excess fat and waist circumference under-reported their weight. This may lead to missed opportunities for risk identification, prevention, and intervention.
doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000495302.06939.b7 fatcat:nmpewgd6wzaalkfe7crogxhyc4