A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Belatacept With Tacrolimus After De Novo Kidney Transplantation

Gretchen N. de Graav, Carla C. Baan, Marian C. Clahsen-van Groningen, Rens Kraaijeveld, Marjolein Dieterich, Wenda Verschoor, Jan H. von der Thusen, Dave L. Roelen, Monique Cadogan, Jacqueline van de Wetering, Joost van Rosmalen, Wilem Weimar (+1 others)
2017 Transplantation  
Clinical Trial Notation: Trial register number NTR4242 (Dutch Trial Register: www.trialregister.nl) Abstract Background Belatacept, an inhibitor of the CD28-CD80/86 co-stimulatory pathway, allows for calcineurin-inhibitor free immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplantation but is associated with a higher acute rejection risk than ciclosporin. Thus, no biomarker for belatacept-resistant rejection has been validated. In this randomized controlled trial, acute rejection-rate was compared
more » ... e was compared between belatacept-and tacrolimus-treated patients and immunological biomarkers for acute rejection were investigated. Methods Forty kidney-transplant recipients were 1:1 randomized to belatacept or tacrolimus combined with basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone. The 1-year incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was monitored. Potential biomarkers, namely CD8 + CD28 -, CD4 + CD57 + PD1and CD8 + CD28 ++ EMRA T cells were measured pre and posttransplantation and correlated to rejection. Pharmacodynamic monitoring of belatacept was performed by measuring free CD86 on monocytes. Results The rejection incidence was higher in belatacept-treated than tacrolimus-treated patients: 55% vs. 10%; p = 0.006. All 3 graft losses, due to rejection, occurred in the belatacept group. Although 4 of 5 belatacept-treated patients with >35 cells CD8 + CD28 ++ EMRA T cells/µL rejected, median pretransplant values of the biomarkers did not differ between belatacept-treated rejectors and nonrejectors. In univariable Cox regressions, the studied cell subsets were not associated with rejection-risk. CD86 molecules on circulating monocytes in belatacept-treated patients were saturated at all time points. Conclusions Belatacept-based immunosuppressive therapy resulted in higher and more severe acute rejection compared to tacrolimus-based therapy. This trial did not identify cellular biomarkers predictive of rejection. In addition, the CD28-CD80/86 co-stimulatory pathway appeared to be sufficiently blocked by belatacept and did not predict rejection.
doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000001755 pmid:28403127 fatcat:uzb5flhuzfbapme2e4s27lkfxq