The Classics of International Law

1909 American Journal of International Law  
Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the mid--seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non--commercial purposes. Read more about Early Journal
more » ... out Early Journal Content at JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not--for--profit organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please contact EDITORIAL COMMENT 701 peace. It may well be that the expressions criticised render the sentence more acceptable to the litigants and therefore the arbiters are to be commended rather than criticised for the language and form of the decision. We should not close our eyes however to the fact that however sincere and however founded in law it may be the decision is a compromise, a triumph of diplomacy transferred from the foreign office to the permanent court of arbitration at The Hague. It is not a judgment such as one would expect from a court of justice. The award is therefore a justification of the solemn declaration of M. Bourgeois at the second Hague conference that the permanent court of arbitration created by the first Hague conference should be continued for the adjustment of political questions, whereas purely legal questions should be submitted to an international court acting under a sense of judicial responsibility. But from whatever standpoint the award be considered, it is a great and notable international event because France and Germany have presented to a court of international arbitration a military question in which honor and vital interests are supposed to be peculiarly involved. War might easily have resulted, but the work of the first conference and an enlightened and insistent public opinion have forced the greatest of military powers to resort to arbitration for the peaceful settlement of international differences, which diplomacy had failed to adjust. THE CLASSICS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW At the banquet of the American Society of International Law, held on the 24th of April, 1909, Dr. Robert S. Woodward, president of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, announced the republication by the institution of the recognized classics of international law. Dr. Woodward explained that the original texts were to be reproduced by photographic process, thus avoiding any corruption of the text, that the text would thus be presented to the modern reader exactly as left by the learned author, that the notes, annotations, or variants, comprising an apparatus criticus, would form an appendix to the text, and that each work selected for republication would be accompanied by an English translation in a separate volume. The series would include not merely a new and critical edition of the masterpiece of Grotius, but the principle works of his predecessors as well as of his successors, and that the leading and recognized cases in international law should be republished in convenient form for the student as well as the general reader.
doi:10.2307/2186697 fatcat:znbrjpok25elhkkn2i2uhrczem