Reply on RC1 [peer_review]

Jackson Toby
2021 unpublished
Dear reviewer, thank you again for taking the time to comment on our manuscript. I have discussed your comments with co-authors and respond to them below. I believe most of the smaller issues were dealt with in my previous reply, so this response deals only with issues arising from the interpretation of the slope of the tree motion power spectrum (Sfreq). I have broken down your major concern b) into three parts, which I will address in turn: Reviewer comment b.1) I find the meaning of the
more » ... meaning of the slope of the tree energy spectrum not clear in the paper. In lines 94-95, it is written that "the slope of the power spectrum (Sfreq) can be used as an overall measure of energy transfer between wind and tree at different frequency C1 BGD Interactive comment Printer-friendly version Discussion paper
doi:10.5194/bg-2020-427-ac1 fatcat:q3lamx67tfa45dg3n56suya3dy