Clinical Results and Optical Quality of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens

Jeong Jae Oh, Jin Seok Choi
2015 Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society  
Purpose: To compare postoperative clinical outcomes, optical quality, and patient satisfaction between two types of diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL, Acri Lisa 366D and Acrysof ReSTOR +3.00 D). Methods: In a total of 68 eyes, one of two diffractive multifocal IOL (Acri Lisa 366D and Acrysof ReSTOR +3.00 D) was implanted after cataract extraction. Visual acuity was measured postoperatively at one week, 1 month, and 6 months. Contrast sensitivity, wavefront aberration, and visual
more » ... on, and visual function were determined via questionnaire at postoperative 1 month. Results: Intermediate visual acuity of Acri Lisa 366D and Acrysof ReSTOR at 6 months were 0.31 ± 0.14, and 0.24 ± 0.11 (log MAR), respectively. At 6 months, near and distant visual acuity results showed no significant differences between the two groups. The photopic contrast sensitivity of Acri Lisa 366D at 6 cycles/degree was 55.36 ± 7.40 and showed significant differences with Acrysof ReSTOR (47.25 ± 9.67). The mesopic contrast sensitivity values of Acri Lisa 366D and Acrysof ReSTOR were 40.26 ± 11.38 and 28.97 ± 10.45, respectively, and the spherical aberration values were 0.037 ± 0.039 μm and 0.105 ± 0.066 μm. The spherical aberration of Acri Lisa 366D was significantly lower than that of Acrysof ReSTOR. Total and high order aberration, coma, and trefoil show no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusions: The Acri Lisa 366D multifocal IOL showed better contrast sensitivity and spherical aberration compared to Acrysof ReSTOR multifocal IOL, which had an effective intermediate visual acuity.
doi:10.3341/jkos.2015.56.12.1867 fatcat:ljdhggqakrdt5p54r3klpljdlq