A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2015; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
A Response to Professor Goldberg: An Anticompetitive Restraint by Any Other Name . .
2005
Social Science Research Network
In ignoring the facts of the Three Tenors case and the transactions costs of legal rulemaking, Professor Goldberg would unnecessarily complicate antitrust law to the detriment of consumers. Contrary to his assertions, the FTC's opinion does not favor ownership over contract. The parties could have chosen to coordinate Three Tenors products and promote a "brand," but their contract explicitly provided otherwise. For a small class of cases -in which the parties restrain basic forms of competition
doi:10.2139/ssrn.681416
fatcat:ckcplbzv6jc5plxidyl5zevjy4