Devotional Exercises in the Public Schools as Interfering with Religious Freedom

1910 The Yale law journal  
Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the mid--seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non--commercial purposes. Read more about Early Journal
more » ... out Early Journal Content at JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not--for--profit organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please contact COMMENTS COMMENTS should it arise, it would present several novel features not heretofore settled. It is contended in Edwards v. Mfg. Bldg. Co., 27 R. I., 248, that a landlord owning an elevator is not a common carrier, nor is he bound by the same degree of care that is imposed upon common carriers, but must exercise only reasonable care for the safety of those who enter his premises. He is not like a common carrier, but his duties are limited to those who have contracted with him for the use of his premises, or those who have business with his tenants. The above view is also held in Shattuck v. Rand, 142 Mass., 83. In conclusion, it might be said that the numerical preponderance, including the Federal court, is without a doubt in favor of holding elevators and common carriers to the same liability, yet it appears that the position taken by the courts of New York, Michigan and Rhode Island is far from being unsound or unjust, and in many cases may be conducive to justice. DEVOTIONAL EXERCISES IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS AS INTERFERING WITH RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.
doi:10.2307/784917 fatcat:yrzqvhpdt5enxeoieh73yldbke