A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2020; you can also visit <a rel="external noopener" href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2017/06/22/151985.full.pdf">the original URL</a>. The file type is <code>application/pdf</code>.
<i title="Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory">
<span class="release-stage" >pre-print</span>
Cell autonomous cancer dependencies are now routinely identified using CRISPR loss-of-function screens. However, a bias exists that makes it difficult to assess the true essentiality of genes located in amplicons, since the entire amplified region can exhibit lethal scores. These false-positive hits can either be discarded from further analysis, which in cancer models can represent a significant number of hits, or methods can be developed to rescue the true-positives within amplified regions.<span class="external-identifiers"> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1101/151985">doi:10.1101/151985</a> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/release/ognzk7yxmnc4zei6yen4vcpi3i">fatcat:ognzk7yxmnc4zei6yen4vcpi3i</a> </span>
more »... propose two methods to rescue true positive hits in amplified regions by correcting for this copy number artefact. The Local Drop Out (LDO) method uses the relative lethality scores within genomic regions to assess true essentiality and does not require additional orthogonal data (e.g. copy number value). LDO is meant to be used in screens covering a dense region of the genome (e.g. a whole chromosome or the whole genome). The General Additive Model (GAM) method models the screening data as a function of the known copy number values and removes the systematic effect from the measured lethality. GAM does not require the same density as LDO, but does require prior knowledge of the copy number values. Both methods have been developed with single sample experiments in mind so that the correction can be applied even in smaller screens. Here we demonstrate the efficacy of both methods at removing the copy number effect and rescuing hits from some of the amplified regions. We estimate a 70-80% decrease of false positive hits in regions of high copy number with either method.
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20200711070230/https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2017/06/22/151985.full.pdf" title="fulltext PDF download" data-goatcounter-click="serp-fulltext" data-goatcounter-title="serp-fulltext"> <button class="ui simple right pointing dropdown compact black labeled icon button serp-button"> <i class="icon ia-icon"></i> Web Archive [PDF] <div class="menu fulltext-thumbnail"> <img src="https://blobs.fatcat.wiki/thumbnail/pdf/5b/1a/5b1a485da9e36826f52af345670d44cc94ec5c77.180px.jpg" alt="fulltext thumbnail" loading="lazy"> </div> </button> </a> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1101/151985"> <button class="ui left aligned compact blue labeled icon button serp-button"> <i class="external alternate icon"></i> biorxiv.org </button> </a>