The Sensitivity of Differential Ratings of Perceived Exertion as Measures of Internal Load

Shaun J. McLaren, Michael Graham, Iain R. Spears, Matthew Weston
2016 International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance  
Word Count: 246 Text-only Word Count: Abstract Purpose: To investigate the sensitivity of differential ratings of perceived exertion (dRPE) as measures of internal load. Methods: Twenty-two, male, university soccer players performed two maximal incremental exercise protocols (Cycle, Treadmill) on separate days. Maximal oxygen uptake (V O2max), maximal heart rate (HRmax), peak blood lactate concentration (B[La]peak) and the post-pre protocol change in countermovement jump height (ΔCMJH) were
more » ... ured for each protocol. Players provided dRPE (CR100 ® ) for breathlessness (RPE-B) and leg exertion (RPE-L) immediately upon exercise termination (RPE-B0, RPE-L0) and 30minutes post-exercise (RPE-B30, RPE-L30). Data were analysed using magnitude-based inferences. Results: There were clear between-protocol differences for V O2max (Cycle 46.5 ± 6.3 vs Treadmill 51.0 ± 5.1 ml·kg -1 ·min -1 , mean difference -9.2%; ±90% confidence limits 3.7%), HRmax (185 ± 13 vs 197 ± 8 b·min -1 , -6.0%; ±1.7%), B[La]peak (9.7 ± 2.1 vs 8.5 ± 2.0 mmol·L -1 , 15%; ±10%) and ΔCMJH (-7.1 ± 4.2 vs 0.6 ± 3.6 cm, -23.2%; ±5.4%). Clear between-protocol differences were recorded for RPE-B0 (78 ± 12 vs 94.7 ± 9.5 AU, -18.1%; ±4.5%), RPE-L0 (92.6 ± 9.7 vs 81 ± 14 AU, 15.3%; ±7.6%), RPE-B30 (70 ± 11 vs 82 ± 13 AU, -13.8%; ±7.3%) and RPE-L30 (86 ± 12 vs 65 ± 19 AU, 37%; ±17%). A substantial timing effect was observed for dRPE, with moderate to large reductions in all scores 30minutes post-exercise when compared to scores collected upon exercise termination. Conclusion: dRPE enhance the precision of internal load measurement and therefore represent a worthwhile addition to training load monitoring procedures.
doi:10.1123/ijspp.2015-0223 pmid:26218099 fatcat:lx4aed5wt5gudljrquh4dvxfri