A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2006; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
Can good learners always compensate for poor learners?
2006
Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - AAMAS '06
Can a good learner compensate for a poor learner when paired in a coordination game? Previous work has given an example where a special learning algorithm (FMQ) is capable of doing just that when paired with a specific less capable algorithm even in games which stump the poorer algorithm when paired with itself. In this paper, we argue that this result is not general. We give a straightforward extension to the coordination game in which FMQ cannot compensate for the lesser algorithm. We also
doi:10.1145/1160633.1160777
dblp:conf/atal/SullivanPBL06
fatcat:ozlb5yo2zbedhbspaeknsajaze