A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2022; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
Whose Extension Counts? A Plurality of Extensions and Their Implications for Credible Evidence Debates
2019
Journal of Human Sciences and Extension
The debate over what counts as credible evidence often occurs on a methodological level (i.e., about what technical applications of systematic inquiry provide believable, justifiable claims about a program). Less often, it occurs on an epistemological level (i.e., about what ways of knowing are appropriate for making claims about a program). Even less often, the debate touches on ontological concerns (i.e., about what conceptualizations of reality, in general or in relation to a specific
doi:10.54718/xybk1801
fatcat:4xsg5aoabrdm5nsl2t5sjwauba