A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2013; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
Paul Zarembka has not read my review of White with sufficient care. At least he does not appear to have understood the criticisms I made of White since his reply does not answer them. My argument is not with the evidence that White assembles and which Zarembka summarises at length but with the conclusions that they both seek to draw from it.doi:10.1163/156920601100414758 fatcat:lcga4eaoobdndn7k3chibuzrzu