A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2019; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
Clinicopathological Prognostic Criteria of Implantation:
Journal of Hard Tissue Biology
This study proposed a protocol of prognostic evaluation system for the purpose of improving the quality of implant technology. Cases were divided into tumor and non-tumor cases according to the criteria proposed by Katagiri (2002). The biopsy factor / five items (B1 to B5) shown below were extracted, and each item was scored on a four-point scale (0 to 3) and evaluated. B1: Presence or absence of peri-implant inflammation (nonspecific reaction), and the severity B2: Presence or absence ofdoi:10.2485/jhtb.16.157 fatcat:mkqh2s3gwzbozdbmozxfwz62fa