Single Versus Triple Injection Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block

Michael J. Fredrickson, Philip Wolstencroft, Ritwik Kejriwal, Albert Yoon, Michael R. Boland, Simon Chinchanwala
2010 Anesthesia and Analgesia  
BACKGROUND: The optimal site for local anesthetic placement during ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block remains controversial. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive lidocaine 2% 30 mL as a single injection posterior to the axillary artery (n ϭ 51) or a triple injection ideally adjacent to each brachial plexus cord (n ϭ 49). Pinprick sensory and motor block (3 ϭ no block, 0 ϭ complete block) were assessed to 20 minutes in the 4 distal nerve territories. RESULTS: The single injection
more » ... up was not significantly inferior (single versus triple injection median [interquartile range] 20-minute aggregate block score: 5 [2-9] vs 7 [3.5-11]) but also demonstrated superiority (2-tailed test, P ϭ 0.043). The single injection technique was associated with a small reduction in procedural time. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal site for local anesthetic placement during ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block is a single point injection posterior to the axillary artery. (Anesth Analg 2010;111:1325-7) From the
doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181f1bbb6 pmid:20705782 fatcat:6hgnwylwyfcufguxtxdjsdd6hm