Low Plasticity Burnishing (LPB) Treatment to Mitigate FOD and Corrosion Fatigue Damage in 17-4 PH Stainless Steel [report]

Paul S. Prevey, N. Jayaraman, Ravi Ravindranath
2003 unpublished
The benefits of applying low plasticity burnishing (LPB) to 17-4PH Stainless Steel (H1100) on both the fatigue and corrosion fatigue performance were compared with the shot peened (SP) and low stress ground (LSG) conditions. LPB treatment dramatically improved both the high cycle fatigue (HCF) performance and fatigue strength. The baseline LSG and SP treatments showed similar fatigue strengths of about 150 ksi (~1035 MPa), while LPB treatment improved the fatigue strength by about 30%.
more » ... ion of an EDM notch of a o = 0.010 in. (0.25 mm) and c o = 0.030 in. (0.75 mm) simulating a semi-elliptical surface foreign object damage (FOD), decreased the fatigue strength of both SP and LSG by nearly 80%, while LPB helped retain much of the fatigue strength at the levels comparable to baseline material without FOD. Corrosion fatigue strength (in the presence of active corrosion medium of 3.5% NaCl solution) of the LSG material showed a drop of nearly 33% from the baseline material without corrosion; LPB material showed corrosion fatigue strength nearly the same as the baseline material without corrosion. While the introduction of a simulated FOD on the LSG dramatically decreased the fatigue strength to less than 15 ksi (~100 MPa), LPB retained nearly 90% of the fatigue strength of the baseline material without corrosion. Mechanistically, the effect of corrosion and FOD resulted in early crack initiation and growth, thus resulting in a dramatic decrease in fatigue performance. Despite the existence of s imilar corrosion conditions, the deep compressive surface residual stresses from LPB treatment helped to mitigate the individual and synergistic effects of corrosion fatigue and FOD. Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 11 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18
doi:10.21236/ada452487 fatcat:g7kjdmo5bndzzgvi6nh7j3ty54