A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2018; you can also visit <a rel="external noopener" href="https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1631%2Fjzus.A1500172.pdf">the original URL</a>. The file type is <code>application/pdf</code>.
An initial categorization of foundational research in complex technical systems
<span title="">2015</span>
<i title="Zhejiang University Press">
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/container/zlforxkowngszn3m3pm4si3xha" style="color: black;">Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A</a>
</i>
There has been intense foundational research in complex technical systems (CTSs) over the last half century. These systems are exemplified by advanced mechatronics systems, embedded control systems, real-time systems, agent-based smart systems, distributed software systems, internet of things systems, and cyber-physical systems. The objective of this paper is to offer an initial cataloguing of the various research domains and to identify the major research issues. The paper has an ontological
<span class="external-identifiers">
<a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.a1500172">doi:10.1631/jzus.a1500172</a>
<a target="_blank" rel="external noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/release/g432ogzpcfdinpesosizbiwknq">fatcat:g432ogzpcfdinpesosizbiwknq</a>
</span>
more »
... avour, because it concentrates on what research has been and is being done, rather than on why and how research is done. The underpinning study has been done in three stages: (i) intuition-driven exploration of a reference set of related academic publications, (ii) evidence-based specification of a categorization of the domains and subdomains of research, and (iii) refinement and validation of the proposed classification based on a control set of related academic publications. The proposed reasoning model identifies three categories of research domains. The 'intellectualizations' category includes research domains such as: (i) philosophy, (ii) ontology, and (iii) epistemology of CTSs. The research domains included in the 'realizations' category are: (iv) methodology, and (v) creation of CTSs. The domains considered in the 'influences' category are: (vi) manifestations, and (vii) axiology of CTSs. Based on the proposed reasoning model a landscape of foundational research in CTSs is proposed for public debate. Our follow-up study focuses on the extension of the proposed classification to other families of complex engineered systems such as sociotechnical systems and social ecosystems.
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20180727190032/https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1631%2Fjzus.A1500172.pdf" title="fulltext PDF download" data-goatcounter-click="serp-fulltext" data-goatcounter-title="serp-fulltext">
<button class="ui simple right pointing dropdown compact black labeled icon button serp-button">
<i class="icon ia-icon"></i>
Web Archive
[PDF]
<div class="menu fulltext-thumbnail">
<img src="https://blobs.fatcat.wiki/thumbnail/pdf/8a/ca/8aca83c73fa852767904204c48bea20882f803e3.180px.jpg" alt="fulltext thumbnail" loading="lazy">
</div>
</button>
</a>
<a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.a1500172">
<button class="ui left aligned compact blue labeled icon button serp-button">
<i class="external alternate icon"></i>
Publisher / doi.org
</button>
</a>