A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2022; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes among Conventional Scleral Fixation, Retropupillary Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens Implantation, and Intrascleral Fixation
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
To compare the efficacy and safety of conventional scleral fixation, retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, and intrascleral fixation. This retrospective observational study included 58 patients (58 eyes) who underwent conventional scleral fixation (C-SF, 23 eyes), retropupillary iris-claw IOL implantation (RP-IOL, 23 eyes), and intrascleral fixation (ISF, 12 eyes) by a single surgeon at Samsung Medical Center from October 2017 to July 2020 and were followed up for atdoi:10.3341/kjo.2022.0042 pmid:35989074 pmcid:PMC9582496 fatcat:r52ar734i5d3dluj7cooost4yq