The impact of improved MEG–MRI co-registration on MEG connectivity analysis

Federico Chella, Laura Marzetti, Matti Stenroos, Lauri Parkkonen, Risto J. Ilmoniemi, Gian Luca Romani, Vittorio Pizzella
2019 NeuroImage  
Co-registration between structural head images and functional MEG data is needed for anatomically-informed MEG data analysis. Despite the efforts to minimize the co-registration error, conventional landmark- and surface-based strategies for co-registering head and MEG device coordinates achieve an accuracy of typically 5-10 mm. Recent advances in instrumentation and technical solutions, such as the development of hybrid ultra-low-field (ULF) MRI-MEG devices or the use of 3D-printed
more » ... rinted individualized foam head-casts, promise unprecedented co-registration accuracy, i.e., 2 mm or better. In the present study, we assess through simulations the impact of such an improved co-registration on MEG connectivity analysis. We generated synthetic MEG recordings for pairs of connected cortical sources with variable locations. We then assessed the capability to reconstruct source-level connectivity from these recordings for 0-15-mm co-registration error, three levels of head modeling detail (one-, three- and four-compartment models), two source estimation techniques (linearly constrained minimum-variance beamforming and minimum-norm estimation MNE) and five separate connectivity metrics (imaginary coherency, phase-locking value, amplitude-envelope correlation, phase-slope index and frequency-domain Granger causality). We found that beamforming can better take advantage of an accurate co-registration than MNE. Specifically, when the co-registration error was smaller than 3 mm, the relative error in connectivity estimates was down to one-third of that observed with typical co-registration errors. MNE provided stable results for a wide range of co-registration errors, while the performance of beamforming rapidly degraded as the co-registration error increased. Furthermore, we found that even moderate co-registration errors (>6 mm, on average) essentially decrease the difference of four- and three- or one-compartment models. Hence, a precise co-registration is important if one wants to take full advantage of highly accurate head models for connectivity analysis. We conclude that an improved co-registration will be beneficial for reliable connectivity analysis and effective use of highly accurate head models in future MEG connectivity studies.
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.061 pmid:31029868 fatcat:yt4lsefbbjagtlv3lorodengte