A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2021; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
AbstractThis essay proposes a new interpretation of a central, and yet overlooked, argument Leibniz offers against Descartes's power-free ontology of the corporeal world. Appealing to considerations about the successiveness of motion, Leibniz attempts to show that the reality of motion requires force. It is often assumed that the argument is driven by concerns inspired by Zeno. Against such a reading, this essay contends that Leibniz's argument is instead best understood against the backgrounddoi:10.1515/agph-2018-0088 fatcat:jktgbmrsffccrb7cbhu52wwyxa