Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and lofepramine

Tony Kendrick, Robert Peveler, Louise Longworth, David Baldwin, Michael Moore, Judy Chatwin, Andrew Thornett, Jonathan Goddard, Michael Campbell, Helen Smith, Martin Buxton, Christopher Thompson
2006 British Journal of Psychiatry  
The cost-effectiveness of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) has not been compared in a prospective study in primary care. Aims To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of TCAs, SSRIs and lofepramine in UK primary care. Method An open-label, three-arm randomised trial with a preference arm. Practitioners referred 327 patients with incident depression. Results No significant differences were found in effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. The
more » ... mbers of depression-free weeks over 12 months (on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were 25.3 (95% CI 21.3–29.0) for TCAs, 28.3 (95% CI 24.3–32.2) for SSRIs and 24.6 (95% CI 20.6–28.9) for lofepramine. Mean health service costs per patient were $762 (95% CI 553–1059) for TCAs, $875 (95% CI 675–1355) for SSRIs and $867 (95% CI 634–1521) for lofepramine. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves suggested SSRIs were most cost-effective (with a probability of up to 0.6). Conclusions The findings support a policy of recommending SSRIs as first-choice antidepressants in primary care.
doi:10.1192/bjp.188.4.337 pmid:16582060 fatcat:t2k3qdmx35bvxa4hcbwocbfn3i