A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2022; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
An Empirical Evaluation of Argumentation in Explaining Inconsistency-Tolerant Query Answering
2017
International Workshop on Description Logics
In this paper we answer empirically the following research question: "Are dialectical explanation methods more effective than one-shot explanation methods for Intersection of Closed Repairs inconsistency tolerant semantics in existential rules knowledge bases?" We ran two experiments with 84 and respectively 38 participants and showed that under certain conditions dialectical approaches are significantly more effective than one-shot explanations. 4
dblp:conf/dlog/HechamASC17
fatcat:eccztgdivfh33igyp5wgfjwczi