A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2017; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning
The traditional conception of validity divides it into three separate and substitutable types-namely, content, criterion, and construct validities. This view is fragmented and incomplete, especially because it fails to take into account both evidence of the value implications of score meaning as a basis for action and the social consequences of score use. The new unified concept of validity interrelates these issues as fundamental aspects of a more comprehensive theory of construct validitydoi:10.1037//0003-066x.50.9.741 fatcat:x6l6auqwhzd5rps4beo3qau3sy