A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2019; you can also visit <a rel="external noopener" href="https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs41125-018-0035-y.pdf">the original URL</a>. The file type is <code>application/pdf</code>.
<i title="Springer Nature">
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/container/xeznvrmkwbc4hk75fsg4nw6wuq" style="color: black;">European Journal for Security Research</a>
Urban physical security and resilience with respect to accidental and intentional explosive events are an increasing issue regarding civil safety and security of modern societies and their citizens. Examples include industrial on-site explosions, gas explosions or terrorist attacks. In particular, multiple, simultaneous and maliciously time-coordinated events are an increasing event type such as complex attack events consisting of targeted combinations of improvised explosive devices. The paper<span class="external-identifiers"> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41125-018-0035-y">doi:10.1007/s41125-018-0035-y</a> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/release/f6z3hsggmre57kqkp76vkhcp7u">fatcat:f6z3hsggmre57kqkp76vkhcp7u</a> </span>
more »... presents a comprehensive, tailorable and stepwise process. This includes methodologies for scenario, hazard, damage, exposure, event frequency, risk and resilience analysis that have been developed, refined and praxis-tested over decades. The focus is on a summarizing description of the modern best practice approach, the validation efforts undertaken for each step as well as two detailed case studies for exemplary presentation and overall validation. In a comprehensive table, the present approach is compared with other state-of-the-art approaches. The paper shows a refined process how to systematically improve resilience when using the tool, in particular through barriers at explosive sites and at exposed sites of various geometries. Furthermore, along the presentation a set of quality requirements regarding explosive event risk and resilience analyses are provided as collected over the years from the in-field, user group and engineering science perspective as well as a broad outlook on extension options for the future.
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190505080013/https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs41125-018-0035-y.pdf" title="fulltext PDF download" data-goatcounter-click="serp-fulltext" data-goatcounter-title="serp-fulltext"> <button class="ui simple right pointing dropdown compact black labeled icon button serp-button"> <i class="icon ia-icon"></i> Web Archive [PDF] <div class="menu fulltext-thumbnail"> <img src="https://blobs.fatcat.wiki/thumbnail/pdf/b7/c7/b7c72fcb9fc5079b68d6b506f646e1c2238d4d1d.180px.jpg" alt="fulltext thumbnail" loading="lazy"> </div> </button> </a> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41125-018-0035-y"> <button class="ui left aligned compact blue labeled icon button serp-button"> <i class="external alternate icon"></i> springer.com </button> </a>