E. Fromm (1941); law sciences I

A Abulkhanova, A Brushlinsky A, P Krupnov V, Pryadein, N Rudkovsky V, V Kudryavtsev, Matveeva, I Menshenina Responsibilityby, Kurenkov
1999 sociological sciences E.Ya. Musaev   unpublished
andreproduction in any medium, on the condition that users give exact credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link tothe Creative Commons license, and indicate if they made any changes. each of the sciences has its own vision and understanding of the problem of responsibility. At the same time, it was found that, despite the large number of works and the diversity of approaches to the ABSTRACT The relevance of the research problem due to the fact that society needs people who
more » ... are able to make their own decisions and take responsibility for their choices, but often there are situations when leaders are not able to delegate responsibility, and emp loyees in turn do not want to take it. The article aims to study the differences in the structure of responsibility of managers and employees' responsibility, analysis of interrelations of components of responsibility with motivation. Leading methods to the study of this problem is a psycho-diagnostic method and method of mathematical statistics (Pearson correlation analysis, factor analysismultivariate statistical method used for studying relationships between values of variables). Processing of empirical data was conducted using SPSS programs. In the result of the study obtained significant differences in the structure of managers and employees' responsibility described the relationship of components of responsibility with motivation. The article can be useful to psychologists, staff managers and administrative managers.
fatcat:oj4qxbgy2baxtatu4752chtctm