Observation on efficacy of pterygium excision combined with autologous limbal epithelial bulbar conjunctival transplantation in the treatment of patients with pterygium

Le-Wen Jiang, Song-Tao Liu, Liang Gao
2022 Guoji Yanke Zazhi  
AIM: To observe the efficacy of pterygium excision combined with autologous limbal epithelial bulbar conjunctival transplantation in the treatment of patients with pterygium. METHODS:Prospective controlled study. A total of 102 patients(102 eyes)with pterygium treated in the hospital between October 2015 and October 2019 were selected as study subjects, and they were divided into observation group and control group according to the random number table method, with 51 cases in each group. The
more » ... trol group was treated with pterygium excision combined with amniotic membrane transplantation, and the observation group was given pterygium excision combined with autologous limbal epithelial bulbar conjunctival transplantation. The perioperative indicators(intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, corneal epithelial repair time)and clinical efficacy at 3mo after surgery were compared between the two groups, and the disease recovery-related indicators [tear film break-up time(BUT), uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), Schirmer Ⅰ test(SⅠt), corneal astigmatism degree(CAD)] before and 3mo after surgery, postoperative aesthetic degree and recurrence during follow-up were recorded.RESULTS:The corneal epithelial repair time in observation group was shorter than that in control group(4.14±1.35 vs 4.72±1.37d,P<0.05), while the surgical time was longer than that in control group(32.24±6.69 vs 29.67±5.21min,P<0.05), and there was no statistical significance in the intraoperative blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05). At 3mo after surgery, there was no statistical difference in the effective rate of treatment between the two groups(86.3% vs 78.4%, P>0.05). At 3mo after surgery, the BUT, UCVA and SⅠt in the two groups were significantly enhanced compared with those before surgery(all P<0.05), and the UCVA and SⅠt in observation group were higher than those in control group(all P<0.05), but there was no statistical difference in the BUT between the two groups(P>0.05). The CAD in the two groups was significantly lower than that befor [...]
doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2022.4.32 doaj:b6ef44d4037e4f34a1a29561f9605f10 fatcat:ajcqhukh3rddzlavq5pfb5bera