Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments: Part II, Evaluating Risk and Monitoring Sediment Remedy Effectiveness

Sabine E. Apitz, John W. Davis, Ken Finkelstein, David W. Hohreiter, Robert Hoke, Richard H. Jensen, Joe Jersak, Victoria J. Kirtay, E. Erin Mack, Victor S. Magar, David Moore, Danny Reible (+1 others)
2005 Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management  
EDITOR'S NOTE: This is the second of a two-part review article on the assessment and management of contaminated sediments. Part I, "Developing an Effective Investigation and Risk Evaluation Strategy," appears in both the print and online editions of IEAM Volume (1), Number (1). ABSTRACT This is the second of a two-part review of the current state-of-the-science pertaining to the assessment and management of contaminated sediments. The goal of this review is to introduce some of the major
more » ... al and policy issues stemming from the assessment and management of contaminated sediments, highlight a number of aspects of contaminated sediment assessment and management found to be successful, and, when appropriate, address the barriers that still exist for improving contaminated sediment management. In Part I (Apitz et al. 2005), the key elements of an effective investigation and risk evaluation strategy were reviewed, beginning with the development of a conceptual site model (CSM) and including a discussion of some of the key factors infl uencing the design of sediment investigations and ecological risk assessment of sediment-bound chemicals on aquatic biota. In this paper, Part II, various approaches are reviewed for evaluating sediment risk and monitoring sediment remedy effectiveness. While many of the technical and policy issues described in this review are relevant to dredged material management, the focus of this paper is on sediment assessment for environmental management.
doi:10.1897/ieam_2004a-002e.1 fatcat:racsahjtfzhxdnck5ntdw7u2se