A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2014; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
Indefinite Extensibility in Natural Language
2013
The Monist
The Monist's call for papers for this issue ended: "if formalism is true, then it must be possible in principle to mechanize meaning in a conscious thinking and language-using machine; if intentionalism is true, no such project is intelligible". We use the Grelling-Nelson paradox to show that natural language is indefinitely extensible, which has two important consequences: it cannot be formalized and model theoretic semantics, standard for formal languages, is not suitable for it. We also
doi:10.5840/monist201396211
fatcat:4c6oowi6hbfvvg2oc7yfpezebi