Response to reviewer #1 [post]

Dagmar Hainbucher
2020 unpublished
We thank reviewer #1 for all his/her comments and criticism which helped us to improve our manuscript. All remarks were taken into account and the text and figures were amended accordingly. There is one exception: We did not remove the depth (m) variable in table 1a). This variable is not a parameter given by the CTD but belongs to the output of the ADCP and lADCP, where no pressure values are given. In general, we agree with the arguments of the reviewer on oxygen measurements. In our
more » ... ts. In our particular case, we had a lot of technical problems with the CTD system which led to a loss of C1
doi:10.5194/essd-2020-82-ac1 fatcat:fad7wup4mngwldsvtoy26dwpye