A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2021; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
TO COMPARE THE OPERATIVE OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH COMBINED PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY PLUS ULTRASONIC LITHOTRIPSY VERSUS PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY ALONE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF STAGHORN RENAL CALCULI
2021
Zenodo
Current guideline recommends percutaneous nephrolithotomy as a procedure of choice having stone size larger than 2 cm, infected stones, lower calyceal stones and in patients in whom shock wave lithotripsy has failed. The pneumatic and ultrasonic lithotripsy devices can be used alone or in combination (pneumatic + ultrasonic). These two systems work through different mechanisms but possess different advantages and disadvantages in practice. Objective: To compare the operative outcomes (e.g.
doi:10.5281/zenodo.4662035
fatcat:zyovtsv3xzd5hmhhaeiybadaya