Initial Mechanical Stabilization of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cements with Different Active Principles

Caroline Santos Ribeiro, Mayra Manoella Perez, Pablo Lenin Benitez-Sellan, Renata de Oliveira Guaré, Eduardo Bresciani, Michele Baffi Diniz
2021 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada  
How to cite: Ribeiro CS, Perez MM, Benitez-Sellan PL, Guaré RO, Bresciani E, Diniz MB. Initial mechanical stabilization of conventional glass ionomer cements with different active principles. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clín Integr. 2021; 21:e0096. https://doi. ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the initial mechanical stabilization of conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs) indicated for the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in different storage periods. Material and Methods: Specimens
more » ... hods: Specimens were divided according to the GIC (n=12): IZ -Ion-Z, KM -Ketac Molar Easymix, RS -Riva Self Cure, and GL -Gold Label 9. They were prepared and stored in distilled water. Superficial microhardness (SMH) was evaluated (KHN) in three phases: (A) after 1, (B) 3, and (C) 7 days of storage. Data were submitted to 2-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (α = 5%). Results: The average KHN values for phases A, B, and C were, respectively, 33.05 ± 9.74; 33.21 ± 10.31 and 52.07 ± 11.75 (IZ); 50.35 ± 11.39; 66.05 ± 10.48 and 67.77 ± 13.80 (KM); 89.63 ± 15.59; 71.31 ± 23.86 and 57.70 ± 16.89 (RS); 42.18 ± 9.03; 68.54 ± 6.83 and 57.95 ± 8.24 (GL). Significant differences were observed: GIC, time, and interaction of both (p<0.05). KHN values differed between the groups, except in the GIC parameter for KM and GL. The time parameter values of phase A were lower than those of B and C, except for IZ and RS. Conclusion: The initial mechanical stabilization differed between the types of GIC tested and the storage time, and after the final period, all had similar SMH.
doi:10.1590/pboci.2021.040 fatcat:f26idospcjh6fkgfcxhrp3xv2y