Generating Up-to-Date and Detailed Land Use and Land Cover Maps Using OpenStreetMap and GlobeLand30

Cidália Fonte, Marco Minghini, Joaquim Patriarca, Vyron Antoniou, Linda See, Andriani Skopeliti
2017 ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information  
With the opening up of the Landsat archive, global high resolution land cover maps have begun to appear. However, they often have only a small number of high level land cover classes and they are static products, corresponding to a particular period of time, e.g., the GlobeLand30 (GL30) map for 2010. The OpenStreetMap (OSM), in contrast, consists of a very detailed, dynamically updated, spatial database of mapped features from around the world, but it suffers from incomplete coverage, and
more » ... of overlapping features that are tagged in a variety of ways. However, it clearly has potential for land use and land cover (LULC) mapping. Thus the aim of this paper is to demonstrate how the OSM can be converted into a LULC map and how this OSM-derived LULC map can then be used to first update the GL30 with more recent information and secondly, enhance the information content of the classes. The technique is demonstrated on two study areas where there is availability of OSM data but in locations where authoritative data are lacking, i.e., Kathmandu, Nepal and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The GL30 and its updated and enhanced versions are independently validated using a stratified random sample so that the three maps can be compared. The results show that the updated version of GL30 improves in terms of overall accuracy since certain classes were not captured well in the original GL30 (e.g., water in Kathmandu and water/wetlands in Dar es Salaam). In contrast, the enhanced GL30, which contains more detailed urban classes, results in a drop in the overall accuracy, possibly due to the increased number of classes, but the advantages include the appearance of more detailed features, such as the road network, that becomes clearly visible. land use models; species distribution modelling) and environmental assessments; the latter includes international conventions such as the Convention on Biodiversity, monitoring of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), monitoring of environmental directives at the EU level and for evidence-based policy-making that is focused on issues such as land take. Some countries and political organizations have their own detailed high resolution land cover products, e.g., the EU, the USA and Australia, but this is not the case for many developing countries. The Africover project from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) produced LULC maps for a number of African countries [3] but these are now out of date and at a coarse resolution of 100 m. In other cases, products do exist but they are not openly shared. Land cover products are also available globally but these have traditionally been produced at coarse resolutions, i.e., between 300 m to 1 km, due to the satellite sensors used and because of their original intended purpose, i.e., to serve the needs of the climate modelling community. More recently, with the opening up of the Landsat archive, global land cover products have been created at a 30-m resolution. The FROM-GLC (Finer Resolution Observation and Monitoring of Global Land Cover) product has been created using fully automated approaches [4] while the GlobeLand30 (GL30) product has been developed using a combination of automated and manual methods [5] . However, these high resolution land cover products still require further validation at the international level to determine if they are useful for different applications. Recently new data sources derived from citizen science, geo-crowdsourcing and applications of volunteered geographic information (VGI) [6] have shown great potential for deriving LULC information (see e.g., [7, 8] ). Among these, the OpenStreetMap (OSM) project, which consists of a freely-licensed, global geospatial database, has attracted considerable research interest from the academic community [9] . OSM represents a potentially valuable source of up-to-date LULC information due to the richness and variety of its map contents [10] . A recent development at the University of Heidelberg is OSMLandUse.org, which represents OSM data as a level 2 CORINE Land Cover (CLC) map [11] . Many OSM-based humanitarian mapping projects have produced large and detailed geospatial databases in the world's less developed countries and where no other sources of accurate spatial data are available. The availability of detailed OSM data in these areas represents a source of up-to-date information that could be used to generate LULC maps that are more accurate or detailed than currently available global products. However, a major issue with OSM data is incomplete spatial coverage, so the key questions are: can we convert OSM data to LULC and then merge it with a high resolution global product such as GL30 to provide an updated LULC product for any location? Can we further enhance this updated product by adding more detail from OSM on urban areas? The aim of this paper is to present a methodology that can answer these questions, i.e., demonstrate how to create two LULC maps from OSM using the nomenclatures from the GL30, produced by the National Geomatic Center of China, and the Urban Atlas (UA), produced by the European Environment Agency. The former is used to produce an updated version of GL30 with more up-to-date information. The latter, after being merged with this updated version, is used to produce an enhanced version of GL30, which contains a more detailed characterization of urban areas. The procedure is tested on two study areas in places where OSM coverage is good but where detailed authoritative LULC maps are not readily available. Data Sources In this section, the two main datasets that are used in this paper are described, i.e., the OSM and the GL30. In addition, a brief description of the UA is provided since the nomenclature is used for deriving the LULC product from OSM. OpenStreetMap (OSM) The OSM project was initiated in 2004 based on Steve Coast's vision that a global map of the world could be crowdsourced using the extensive local knowledge of people living and working in
doi:10.3390/ijgi6040125 fatcat:lxmsi3cefve5flinqagwx7dpdi