Dr. Schurer on the Fourth Gospel [stub]

1891 The Old and New Testament Student  
Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the mid--seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non--commercial purposes. Read more about Early Journal
more » ... out Early Journal Content at http://about.jstor.org/participate--jstor/individuals/early-journal--content. JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not--for--profit organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. 1891] Synopses of Important Articles. 311 or less Christian. It does not necessarily follow that private revenge is not Mosaic because it is unchristian. Legislative provisions which at one time are the most practical in effecting desired results may at another time be quite out of harmony or inadequate to the advanced condition of society. We greatly need to cultivate the historic view of Jewish history; it is only by this process that the Old Testament Scriptures can be vitalized and made to have an influence upon men. The Inerrancy of the Original Autograph.* In the currant discussion as to the quality and extensiveness of Biblical inspiration, the question has narrowed itself down to this: Was the original manuscript absolutely correct or not? It is admitted on all hands that there are errors in our current copies of Scripture, though the most radical of biblioclasts does not allege that any fundamental truth is affected by them. But the people are grasping the fact that the question touching the inerrancy of the original document is of such vital importance that it marks the divisional line between loyalty and disloyalty to the truth of God. It is quite sufficient for all practical purposes to know that the original copy of the Scriptures was thus flawless. The veracity of God is cleared in this manner, and the Scriptures are vindicated from the scandal that they merely "contain" his word. The Scriptures would not be God's written Word unless they were quite free from error [originally, is meant]. Truly there are many views of Biblical Inspiration, and the discussion concerning it which now abounds in the religious press, yes in the secular press as well, brings some quaint theories to the light. But it is a little surprising to find so eminent a minister as Dr. Burrell in the possession of such a theory as the above, and still more surprising to find it set forth in the columns of the N. Y. Independeut. Could the Independent have really supposed that it was contributing, in the publicatian of the article, to the solution of this vexed problem ? The agitation of the question is of the first importance. It is by such thorough discussion that truth is developed and formulated, and the church now demands a consistent, iutelligent, Christian theory of Biblical Inspiration. Let every sincere effort be made, through every channel, to work out such a theory.