Comparative Assessment of Urinary Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG Gene Fusion with the Serum [-2]Proprostate-Specific Antigen-Based Prostate Health Index for Detection of Prostate Cancer

C. Stephan, K. Jung, A. Semjonow, K. Schulze-Forster, H. Cammann, X. Hu, H.-A. Meyer, M. Bogemann, K. Miller, F. Friedersdorff
2012 Clinical Chemistry  
BACKGROUND: We compared urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2):v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (avian) (ERG) gene fusion (T2:ERG), and the serum [Ϫ2]proprostate-specific antigen ([Ϫ2]proPSA)-based prostate health index (Phi) for predicting biopsy outcome. METHODS: Serum samples and first-catch urine samples were collected after digital rectal examination (DRE) from consented outpatients with PSA 0.5-20 g/L who were scheduled for
more » ... re scheduled for prostate biopsy. The PCA3 score (PROGENSA PCA3, Hologic Gen-Probe) and T2:ERG score (Hologic Gen-Probe) were determined. Measurements of serum PSA, free PSA, and [Ϫ2]proPSA (Beckman Coulter) were performed, and the percentages of free PSA (%fPSA) and Phi ([Ϫ2]proPSA/ %fPSA ϫ ͌PSA) were determined. RESULTS: Of 246 enrolled men, prostate cancer (PCa) was diagnosed in 110 (45%) and there was no evidence of malignancy (NEM) in 136 (55%). A first set of biopsies was performed in 136 (55%) of all men, and 110 (45%) had Ն1 repeat biopsies. PCA3, Phi, and T2:ERG differed significantly between men with PCa and NEM, and these markers showed the largest areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) (0.74, 0.68, and 0.63, respectively). PCA3 had the largest AUC of all parameters, albeit not statistically different from Phi. Phi showed somewhat lower specificities than PCA3 at 90% sensitivity. Combination of both markers enhanced diagnostic power with modest AUC gains of 0.01-0.04. Although PCA3 had the highest AUC in the repeat-biopsy cohort, the highest AUC for Phi was observed in DRE-negative patients with PSA in the 2-10 g/L range. CONCLUSIONS: PCA3 and Phi were superior to the other evaluated parameters but their combination gave only moderate enhancements in diagnostic accuracy for PCa at first or repeat prostate biopsy.
doi:10.1373/clinchem.2012.195560 pmid:23213079 fatcat:mwbvhwfvyrbtfizabazai6s4sa