Human Security and Security Sector Reform: Contrasts and Commonalities

David M. Law
2005 S+F. Sicherheit und Frieden. Security and Peace  
14 | S + F ( 2 3 . J g . ) 1 / 2 0 0 5 gewisses Maß an Autonomie in den Beziehungen zu extraregionalen Akteuren zu verfügen. Gerade Krisenregionen wie der afrikanische Kontinent oder Zentralasien sind durch eine hohe Empfindlichkeit gegenüber globalen Faktoren -Keohane und Nye würden von asymmetrischer Verwundbarkeit sprechen 44 gekennzeichnet. Deshalb ist es analytisch für einen an Krisenregionen orientierten, integrierten Sicherheits-begriff geradezu zwingend, inner-und zwischenstaatliche
more » ... liktkonstellationen stets in Bezug zur Struktur und zu den Entwicklungen des jeweiligen regionalen Subsystems zu setzen. Abstract: Human security and security sector reform are relatively new to the lexicon of foreign and security policy, having both emerged in the post-Cold War world of the 1990s. The two concepts have much in common but they are also very different. This article reviews the thinking that underlines the two concepts and examines the way they relate to one another. In particular, it looks at their commonalities and differences in terms of core function, relationship to the state and state security, objective, scope, actors, and the criteria that are associated with their successful implementation. By means of a few practical examples, the different discourses that typically characterize the two concepts are contrasted and compared.
doi:10.5771/0175-274x-2005-1-14 fatcat:7jeht4b2kfa5zdpn4mw2h5ppjy