Internet Archive Scholar

The fundamental questions left unanswered: response to commentary on the 'problems with delay discounting'

Allen J Bailey, Ricardo J Romeu, Peter R Finn
2022

Preserved Fulltext

fulltext thumbnail
Web Archive Capture PDF (205.6 kB)
https://web.archive.org/web/20220425111343/https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/722A9D884043671A25DB6F95CC475A9B/S0033291721005572a.pdf/div-class-title-the-fundamental-questions-left-unanswered-response-to-commentary-on-the-problems-with-delay-discounting-div.pdf

A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2022; you can also visit the original URL. The file type is application/pdf.

We appreciate the opportunity to continue a dialogue on these important issues. We will briefly address some specific points of Stein, MacKillop, McClure, and Bickel (2022) , but will open with a few general comments. First, we recognize the seminal contributions of the authors of the commentary (Stein et al., 2022) to the understanding of intemporal choice (ITC; Dai and Busemeyer, 2014) and psychopathology. We also see great value in the research that aims to understand ITC and how such
more » ... es relate to clinical phenomena. Indeed, our group has published a number of articles utilizing essentially the same measure of discounting that we now critique as having significant limitations (
doi:10.1017/s0033291721005572 pmid:35118936 fatcat:yptatzjvwjhfhfcjjkplyu2nzq
Citation

Allen J Bailey, Ricardo J Romeu, Peter R Finn. "The fundamental questions left unanswered: response to commentary on the 'problems with delay discounting'." (2022) 1-2