Temporal discounting: The differential effect of proximal and distal consequences on confession decisions

Stephanie Madon, Max Guyll, Kyle C. Scherr, Sarah Greathouse, Gary L. Wells
2011 Law and Human Behavior  
Drawing on the psychological principle that proximal consequences influence behavior more strongly than distal consequences, the authors tested the hypothesis that criminal suspects exhibit a shortsightedness during police interrogation that increases their risk for confession. Consistent with this hypothesis, Experiment 1 showed that participants (N ϭ 81) altered how frequently they admitted to criminal and unethical behaviors during an interview to avoid a proximal consequence even though
more » ... g so increased their risk of incurring a distal consequence. Experiment 2 (N ϭ 143) yielded the same pattern, but with a procedure that reversed the order of the proximal and distal consequences, thereby ruling out the possibility that it was the unique characteristics of the consequences rather than their proximity that influenced the admission rate. The authors discuss the supported psychological process as a potential explanation for several well-established findings reported in the literature on confessions.
doi:10.1007/s10979-011-9267-3 fatcat:sjcyzbz35vbonnwuflszkphhcy