Dünyada Ve Türkiye Türkçesinde Ağız Çalışmaları Ve Yöntemler

Ahmet ADIGÜZEL
2013 Turkish Studies  
Dialect is one of important language fields of Turkish in Turkey. Works of dialect include not only satisified information but also functions of language such as phonetics, morpholohy and syntax. It is used methods such as styl, manner coherence, usage of source Works in many places about Turkish dialects. Unfortunalty, there are a lot of problems about the follow methods. These problems take place in first sections and the others. So there is no any cooperation in Works of Turkish dialects.
more » ... urkish dialects. Works of dialects include phonetics, morphology, syntax forms and important informations about diachronic, synchronic. Works of dialect are one of the most diffucult work in fields of linguistic which is barnch of linguistic. It will be menitoned about the follow methods in this writting. Definitely, ethinic structure most be take into consideration and in this subject it should be benefit from historians and Works of archives. Ethnic structure more important than geogrophical region. Ethnic structure of dialet is really a very important subject. Feautures of languages have been apart from Oğuz dialect in Turkey. In this article, I tried to make by examining dialect of West Turkish language. I also tried to Show Works of linguistic. I mentioned about Turkish language and its features and especially dialect of Oğuz as well. These dialects are very useful and important in Turkish language. I tried yo make as a perspective its aim and results. Dünyada ve Türkiye Türkçesinde Ağız Çalışmaları ve Yöntemler Ağız araĢtırmaları, dil bilimi alanında en zor çalıĢmaların yapıldığı bir alt alandır. Derleme tekniklerinin bilinmesi, metin derlenecek yer ve kiĢilerin tespiti, araçların temini, metnin derlenmesi, bant kayıtlarının çözümlenmesi ve transkripsiyonun yapılarak metnin oluĢturulması... gibi çok çeĢitli çalıĢmaları içine alan ağız araĢtırmalarının pek çok zorluğu vardır (Öçalan, Tuncer Gülensoy Hatıra sayısı 2006/1).
doi:10.7827/turkishstudies.4919 fatcat:45fhkrwiarcbrf6wux5r6vruea