##
###
Delegating Computation

Shafi Goldwasser, Yael Tauman Kalai, Guy N. Rothblum

2015
*
Journal of the ACM
*

In this work we study interactive proofs for tractable languages. The (honest) prover should be efficient and run in polynomial time, or in other words a "muggle". 1 The verifier should be super-efficient and run in nearly-linear time. These proof systems can be used for delegating computation: a server can run a computation for a client and interactively prove the correctness of the result. The client can verify the result's correctness in nearly-linear time (instead of running the entire
## more »

... tation itself). Previously, related questions were considered in the Holographic Proof setting by Babai, Fortnow, Levin and Szegedy, in the argument setting under computational assumptions by Kilian, and in the random oracle model by Micali. Our focus, however, is on the original interactive proof model where no assumptions are made on the computational power or adaptiveness of dishonest provers. Our main technical theorem gives a public coin interactive proof for any language computable by a log-space uniform boolean circuit with depth d and input length n. The verifier runs in time (n+d)·polylog(n) and space O(log(n)), the communication complexity is d · polylog(n), and the prover runs in time poly(n). In particular, for languages computable by log-space uniform N C (circuits of polylog(n) depth), the prover is efficient, the verifier runs in time n · polylog(n) and space O(log(n)), and the communication complexity is polylog(n). Using this theorem we make progress on several questions: • We show how to construct short (polylog size) computationally sound non-interactive certificates of correctness for any log-space uniform N C computation, in the public-key model. The certificates can be verified in quasi-linear time and are for a designated verifier: each certificate is tailored to the verifier's public key. This result uses a recent transformation of Kalai and Raz from public-coin interactive proofs to one-round arguments. The soundness of the certificates is based on the existence of a PIR scheme with polylog communication. • Interactive proofs with public-coin, log-space, poly-time verifiers for all of P. This settles an open question regarding the expressive power of proof systems with such verifiers. • Zero-knowledge interactive proofs with communication complexity that is quasi-linear in the witness length for any N P language verifiable in N C , based on the existence of one-way functions. • Probabilistically checkable arguments (a model due to Kalai and Raz) of size polynomial in the witness length (rather than the instance length) for any N P language verifiable in N C , under computational assumptions.

doi:10.1145/2699436
fatcat:loxaz5ha4zfu3euozgvdw6xmim