Splitting authentication codes with perfect secrecy: New results, constructions and connections with algebraic manipulation detection codes

Maura B. Paterson, Douglas R. Stinson
2021 Advances in Mathematics of Communications  
<p style='text-indent:20px;'>A splitting BIBD is a type of combinatorial design that can be used to construct splitting authentication codes with good properties. In this paper we show that a design-theoretic approach is useful in the analysis of more general splitting authentication codes. Motivated by the study of algebraic manipulation detection (AMD) codes, we define the concept of a <i>group generated</i> splitting authentication code. We show that all group-generated authentication codes
more » ... ave perfect secrecy, which allows us to demonstrate that algebraic manipulation detection codes can be considered to be a special case of an authentication code with perfect secrecy.</p><p style='text-indent:20px;'>We also investigate splitting BIBDs that can be "equitably ordered". These splitting BIBDs yield authentication codes with splitting that also have perfect secrecy. We show that, while group generated BIBDs are inherently equitably ordered, the concept is applicable to more general splitting BIBDs. For various pairs <inline-formula><tex-math id="M1">\begin{document}$ (k, c) $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>, we determine necessary and sufficient (or almost sufficient) conditions for the existence of <inline-formula><tex-math id="M2">\begin{document}$ (v, k \times c, 1) $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>-splitting BIBDs that can be equitably ordered. The pairs for which we can solve this problem are <inline-formula><tex-math id="M3">\begin{document}$ (k, c) = (3, 2), (4, 2), (3, 3) $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="M4">\begin{document}$ (3, 4) $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>, as well as all cases with <inline-formula><tex-math id="M5">\begin{document}$ k = 2 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
doi:10.3934/amc.2021054 fatcat:5qza23l3irh2bhnpdmkxwusnfm