Accuracy of guided biopsy of the jawbone in a clinical setting: A retrospective analysis

Martin Lotz, Caterina Schumacher, Bernd Stadlinger, Kristian Ikenberg, Martin Rücker, Silvio Valdec
2021
The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of a previously described technique for guided biopsy of osseous pathologies of the jawbone in a clinical setting. The data sets of patients who had undergone guided biopsy procedures were retrospectively examined for accuracy. Digital planning of the biopsies and manufacturing of the tooth-supported drilling template were performed with superimposed cone beam computed tomography and intraoral scans using implant planning software. After a
more » ... ephine biopsy was taken using the template, the postoperative low-dose cone beam computed tomography was analyzed for accuracy using the planning software with the corresponding (digitally-planned) biopsy cylinder. The mean angular deviation was 4.35 ± 2.5°. The mean depth deviation was -1.40 ± 1.41 mm. Guided biopsy seems to be an alternative to a conventional approach for minimally invasive and highly accurate jawbone biopsy. Silvio (2021). Accuracy of guided biopsy of the jawbone in a clinical setting: A retrospective analysis. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 49(7):556-561. abstract The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of a previously described technique for guided biopsy of osseous pathologies of the jawbone in a clinical setting. The data sets of patients who had undergone guided biopsy procedures were retrospectively examined for accuracy. Digital planning of the biopsies and manufacturing of the tooth-supported drilling template were performed with superimposed cone beam computed tomography and intraoral scans using implant planning software. After a trephine biopsy was taken using the template, the postoperative low-dose cone beam computed tomography was analyzed for accuracy using the planning software with the corresponding (digitallyplanned) biopsy cylinder. The mean angular deviation was 4.35 ± 2.5 . The mean depth deviation was À1.40 ± 1.41 mm. Guided biopsy seems to be an alternative to a conventional approach for minimally invasive and highly accurate jawbone biopsy.
doi:10.5167/uzh-205586 fatcat:jhg6vrlrbrfnrbxojvpyzornbm