Ecoznometrics [E. Lepa, trans. (Pergamon, London, 1959)], includes an appendix by K. Porwit in which data for Poland are applied to Polish problems. 15. P. C. Mahalanobis, "Some observations on the process of growth of national income," Sankhya, 307 (1952). 16. , "The approach of operational research to planning in India," ibid., 3 (1955); "Draft plan-frame for the second five-year plan," ibid., 63 ( 1955). These articles and that cited in 15, all of them written after several visits to the

more »

... et Union, presumably embody some of what Mahalanobis considers the lessons of both Marxist theory and Soviet experience. In fact, as E. D. Domar has pointed out, Mahalanobis's work was partly foreshadowed, as early as 1928, by the work of the neglected Soviet economist G. A. Feldman, although Mahalanobis learned of Feldman's paper only after the appearance of his own model (see 17). 17. E. D. Domar, "A Soviet model of growth," in Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1957). 18. See M. Bronfenbrenner, Economic Development and Cultural Change (1960), pp. 45-51, for an earlier discussion along similar lines, which includes considerably more criticism along with the exposition. 19. Because of these definitions, Mahalanobis's I and C sectors differ from the Marxian "Departments" I and II of Das Kapital. Interestingly enough, Feldman also reor-Ecoznometrics [E. Lepa, trans. (Pergamon, London, 1959)], includes an appendix by K. Porwit in which data for Poland are applied to Polish problems. 15. P. C. Mahalanobis, "Some observations on the process of growth of national income," Sankhya, 307 (1952). 16. , "The approach of operational research to planning in India," ibid., 3 (1955); "Draft plan-frame for the second five-year plan," ibid., 63 (1955). These articles and that cited in 15, all of them written after several visits to the Soviet Union, presumably embody some of what Mahalanobis considers the lessons of both Marxist theory and Soviet experience. In fact, as E. D. Domar has pointed out, Mahalanobis's work was partly foreshadowed, as early as 1928, by the work of the neglected Soviet economist G. A. Feldman, although Mahalanobis learned of Feldman's paper only after the appearance of his own model (see 17). 17. E. D. Domar, "A Soviet model of growth," in Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1957). 18. See M. Bronfenbrenner, Economic Development and Cultural Change (1960), pp. 45-51, for an earlier discussion along similar lines, which includes considerably more criticism along with the exposition. 19. Because of these definitions, Mahalanobis's I and C sectors differ from the Marxian "Departments" I and II of Das Kapital. Interestingly enough, Feldman also reor-